if no accounts will be deleted just to fit everyone...then ok to merge.
if we need to sacrafice any accounts for the merge...NO!
Just after the last big update the server was so crowded...how is one server going to fit both when the new update comes? not everyone will have a spot to train, and bosses need to spawn like what... every 20min just to be enough for everyone? even with the so called "dead server"... ppl are asking for shorter spawning time...and ppl complaining about no spot to train + gm will definitely need to "expand" World Arena. Ppl might want it now because no new stuff happening, but when the new update comes out... is one server really enough? so i think merging won't solve the problem. Ppl will always have something to complain no matter.
I support the idea of "cross-server war" but not merging.
yeh the idea for cross-server war is very advanced. I vote for players lvl 100+ and winners of the combat get potage as reward and whole server a x2 exp event till maintance. This will increase the popularity of the servers. also merging bitcomet I and II(III) is super bad idea since:
it wont be so clear = too much players
complains about LIMITED map spots(turtle,wave,world arena(WA),and others)
when the new 2 or more maps come out i noticed that there are limited spots also there(entance spot at bridge in emerald and near castles on the new map) so there will be massive wars and mobs for spots there.
Merging Saga + Aurora into Colossus(Saga,Aurora,Twilight) is not a bad idea since Saga is very borring these days and twilight has more wars there days = more fun!! and more active players
also state wars wont be - go kill draggy and when emp loses all pp4 start farming honor and then dyna must teach them why they shoudnt farm
Houses - this is the most important thing before merging the servers. all players have their houses and deeds that throwed tons of money. they will lose that (title deed 4 costs like 100m+ or 3 title deed 3 + 400 tokens in MB)
my suggestion - make 2 new updown maps and place the houses there. for the other spots you can put on each place a boss so players can kill something at least. i suggest also if you do this to put a random lvl boss on each updown spot(example: I(II) updown put bardeis,III - skinnel,IV - custor,etc)
My choise: NO, they shouldnt be merged
Life is a game. Everyone makes mistakes, but you cant take them back...
gm if you will merge the bit 1 and bit 2 make 2 uptown cause some player they have 5 acc. with 5 houses how about the other player example i am playing almost 2 years now this game until now i dont have house make more houses in uptown gmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
ghibxz16 , bitcomet I and bitcomet II arent Aurora and Genesis , those are other 2 servers lool...
So there wont be any merging with aurora and/or genesis unless GMs open another 1 or 2 servers (PLEASE DONT DO IT)
Lets be real...If all bitcomet players want a merge, then I am with them. All it means for me is that I don't have to log in on two servers anymore to visit with friends. But merging still won't solve the problem. What is the problem you ask? The game is still dying. If you simply released an update of substance, meaning new material for players to enjoy and NOT more stuff in the item mall to sell, then more people -- like myself -- would be encouraged to play. Merging these servers will NOT make me want to play this game more. What will make me want to play is releasing new maps. Releasing new class transfers. Releasing something other than what I have to pay real life money for. I have spent more than my share on this game. I believe myself and all other players who have done the same can agree.